Pembaca Sebagai Penikmat Karya Sastra: Menguak Topik Teratas Fiksimini di Twitter Readers as works of literature: revealing the top flash fiction topics on Twitter
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to describe the most popular flash fiction topics by readers and connoisseurs of flash fiction literary works on Twitter. This descriptive qualitative research uses data sources from the @fiksimini Twitter account from July 2019 to July 2020. The reading and note-taking technique were used for data collection, with the data collection instrument being the researcher who used the parameters of Iser's literary reception theory. Data analysis was conducted through three stages: data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that the topics presented by the @fiksimini account can be divided into three issues: past, current, and future. The issue of the future is the top topic and is most in demand by readers and literature lovers, with an average score of 9.38. In addition, readers and viewers of the @fiksimini account can contribute to creating interesting flash fiction stories. The digital literary activity occurs due to the reception of readers involved in creating flash fiction by 65.21% and readers' retweets of flash fiction topics by 2.1%. Readers who can enjoy and contribute to digital literature on the @fiksimini Twitter account can make this digital literature work increasingly popular among the public.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
References
Al-Hindawi, F. H., & Saffah, M. D. (2019). Literary Pragmatics. Literary Pragmatics, Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 10(2), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315735849
Beach, R. (1993). A Teacher’s Introduction to Reader-response Theories. National Council of Teachers of English.
Bouchardon, S. (2018). Mind the Gap! 10 Gaps for Digital Literature? Electronic Literature Organization 2018, 1–28.
Budiyanto, D., Hartono, H., & Suroso, S. (2022). Bentuk dan karakteristik Fiksimini di platform sosial media Twitter dan Instagram. Litera, 21(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v21i2.43349
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Gardner, R. P. (2016). Unforgivable Blackness: Visual Rhetoric, Reader Response, and Critical Racial Literacy. Children’s Literature in Education, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-016-9291-5
Iser, W. (1972). The reading process?: A phenomenological approach. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 3(2), 279–299. https://www.jstor.org/stable/468316
Kartikasari, R., Anoegrajekti, N., & Maslikatin, T. (2014). Realitas Sosial dan Representasi Fiksimini dalam Tinjauan Sosiologi Sastra. Publika Budaya, 2(1), 50–57.
Lászlóa, J., & Cupchik, G. C. (1995). The Role of Affective Processes in Reading Time and Time Experience during Literary Reception. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 13(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.2190/0ubb-cwp2-7guj-xdy0
Pradopo, R. D. (2012). Beberapa Teori Sastra, Metode Kritik, dan Penerapannya. Pustaka Pelajar.
Purves, A. C., & Beach, R. (1972). Literature and the Reader: Research in Response to Literature, Reading Interests, and the Teaching of Literature. In The English Journal. National Council of Teachers of English.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (2009). The Literary Transaction: Evocation and Response. Theory Into Practice, 21(4), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848209543018
Sadler, N. (2018). Narrative and Interpretation on Twitter: Reading Tweets by Telling Stories. New Media and Society, 20(9), 3266–3282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817745018
Sari, A. V., & Teguh, S. (2022). Analisis Koherensi dalam Topik Fiksi Mini. Kandai, 18(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.26499/jk.v18i1.3269
Schrøder, K. C. (2015). Reception Analysis. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc162
Subagyo, P. J. (2006). Metode Penelitian dalam Teori dan Praktek. Rineka Cipta.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.