The Spectrality of Technology and the Gendered Subjugation in Stephen King’s Mr. Mercedes Spektralitas Teknologi dan Penaklukan Gender dalam “Mr. Mercedes” Karya Stephen King

Main Article Content

Sridheepika Varadareddiar Subramanian

Abstract

This study examines Stephen King’s Mr. Mercedes as a techno-horror narrative in which technology operates as a spectral force that reinforces patriarchal domination. Combining the issue of gendered subjugation with the objective of analyzing its technological mechanisms, this research investigates how digital tools function as invisible yet pervasive instruments of control. Using a qualitative textual analysis grounded in Goldman’s concept of spectral reading and Faulkner’s gendered technology framework, the study explores how Brady Hartsfield weaponizes surveillance, digital manipulation, and remote intimidation to harm and dominate women, particularly Holly and Janey. The findings reveal that technology in the novel exceeds its function as a mere tool; it becomes a ghostly presence that destabilizes privacy, autonomy, and psychological security. Through this portrayal, King critiques the insidious forms of violence enabled by technological mediation and exposes the heightened vulnerability of marginalized individuals in digitized environments. The study concludes that Mr. Mercedes operates as a contemporary parable of invisible power structures regulating modern gender relations through technological means.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Subramanian, S. V. (2025). The Spectrality of Technology and the Gendered Subjugation in Stephen King’s Mr. Mercedes: Spektralitas Teknologi dan Penaklukan Gender dalam “Mr. Mercedes” Karya Stephen King. Journal of Literature and Education, 3(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.69815/jle.v3i2.177
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Sridheepika Varadareddiar Subramanian, Nehru Memorial College, Affiliated to Bharathidasan University

Nehru Memorial College, Affiliated to Bharathidasan University
Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India
Email: sridheepikaraja94@gmail.com
Orcid: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5116-3153

References

Balmar, D., & Mellström, U. (2019). Cyborgs and entanglements of technology, masculinity, and (automated) vehicles. Feminist Scholarship, 37(2), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1515/fs-2019-0030

Egan, J. M. (1989). Sacral parody in the fiction of Stephen King. Journal of Religious Thought, 23(3), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3840.1989.00125.x

Faulkner, W. (2001). The technology question in feminism: A view from feminist technology studies. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(00)00166-7

Goldman, J. (2021). Sexual violence, narrative authority, and spectral reading. American Book Review, 42(2), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.1353/abr.2021.0006

Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., & Wajcman, J. (1991). Women’s and men’s expectations about the effects of new technology at work. Group & Organization Studies, 16(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960119101600105

Harris, B. (2020). Technology and violence against women. In Emerald studies in digital violence (pp. 317–336). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-955-720201026

Hertlein, K. M., Ancheta, J., & Bonomi, A. (2020). A framework for assessing technology-mediated IPV. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 19(4), 296–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2020.1838377

Jackson, K. (2013). Technology, monstrosity, and reproduction in twenty-first century horror. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137360267

King, S. (2014). Mr. Mercedes. Scribner.

Laist, R. (2010). Technology and postmodern subjectivity in Don DeLillo’s novels. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-0484-8

McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2012). Sexual harassment, workplace authority, and the paradox of power. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 625–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412451728

Purdy, S. B. (1984). Technopoetics: Seeing what literature has to do with the machine. Critical Inquiry, 11(1), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1086/448278

Rakow, L. F. (1988). Gendered technology, gendered practice. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 5(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038809366685

Rahman, M. Z., & Ahmed, S. S. (2022). Investigating the (non-)being: A spectral reading of William Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying. AIOR International Journal, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1996.01.04.42

Soofastaei, E., & Mirenayat, S. A. (2015). Politics, violence, and victimization in Margaret Atwood’s selected novels. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 50, 86–90. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.50.86

Winkelmann, C. (1997). Women in the integrated circuit: Morphing the academic/community divide. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 18(1), 19–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3347195

Yu, C., Manshadi, M., & Chen, L. (2021). Hope and anxiety: The study of female embodied experience with assisted reproductive technology. Health Psychology Open, 7(2), 138–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150X211002982