Deconstruction and Subversion in Literature: Countering the Hegemony of Colonial Discourse Dekonstruksi dan Subversi dalam Sastra: Sebuah Refleksi Perlawanan Terhadap Hegemoni Wacana Kolonial
Main Article Content
Abstract
The traces of colonialism continue to shape the way we think and understand culture, identity and power. This is often through stigmatized ideas of race and simplified distinctions between “us” and “them.” These narratives, rooted in colonial discourse, tend to ignore the complexity of indigenous realities. This research attempts to explore how postcolonial writers challenge and deconstruct these dominant narratives, revealing their political and ideological underpinnings. Drawing on Jacques Derrida’s concept of deconstruction, it examines how contradictions in colonial texts can be exposed and subverted to make room for alternative voices. Through an in-depth analysis of literary works such as The Wretched of the Earth, Season of Migration to the North, 1984, and The Book of Chameleons. The findings of the study highlight how literature becomes a tool of resistance that, through deconstruction and subversion, reshapes identities, reclaims silenced stories, and undermines colonial authority. Equally significant, by demonstrating that meaning is never fixed, the strategies of deconstruction and subversion employed in these works underscore the power of literature to disrupt hegemonic narratives and to open up new, pluralistic perspectives on the complexities of the postcolonial world.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
References
Ahmed, Y. (2021). Political discourse analysis: A decolonial approach. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(1), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1755707
Akintayo, C. (2024). Exploring the postcolonial legacy in the poetry of Christopher Okigbo. Bulletin of Language and Literature Studies, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59652/blls.v1i1.389
Alkhawaldeh, M. (2024). Bioregionalism in Tayeb Salih’s Season of Migration to the North: A postcolonial study. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2373567. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2373567
Amirouche, N. (2021). Counter-discourse in postcolonial African novel. El Omda Review in Linguistics and Discourse Analysis, 5(2), 520–532. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/152647
Anson, P. (2020). ‘The object of power is power’: Tautology, paranoia, and George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Textual Practice, 34(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2018.1508066
Barrowcliffe, R. (2021). Closing the narrative gap: Social media as a tool to reconcile institutional archival narratives with Indigenous counter-narratives. Archives and Manuscripts, 49(3), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2021.1883074
Bhabha, H. K. (2012). The location of culture. Routledge.
Burawoy, M. (2019). Symbolic violence: Conversations with Bourdieu. Duke University Press.
Burns, B. (2021). Hybridization of the self, colonial discourse and the deconstruction of value systems: A postcolonial literary theory perspective of literature inculpating colonialism (Bachelor’s thesis, University of Gävle). DiVA Portal. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1523521/FULLTEXT01
Butler, J. (2016). Rethinking vulnerability and resistance. In Vulnerability in resistance (pp. 12–27). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11vc78r
Carey, J. (2012). The intellectuals and the masses: Pride and prejudice among the literary intelligentsia 1880-1939. Faber & Faber.
Constantinescu, C. (2021). Fiction may confront theories. Locating determinism of the Newspeak in G. Orwell’s 1984. Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory, 7(2), 216–231. https://www.metacriticjournal.com/article/213/fiction-may-confront-theories-locating-determinism-of-the-newspeak-in-g-orwells-1984
Demaria, C. (2020). What is a post-conflict culture? Temporalities and agencies of post-conflict memories. In C. Demaria, Post-conflict cultures: A reader (pp. 9–43). https://iris.unimore.it/retrieve/99ad0e8f-cbc7-4e3f-9699-56a3acbc1d9c/Post%20conflict%20cultures.pdf
Derrida, J. (2010). Deconstruction. In A dictionary of literary terms and literary theory.
Derrida, J. (2020). Deconstruction in a nutshell: A conversation with Jacques Derrida, with a new introduction. Fordham University Press.
During, S. (2000). Postcolonialism and globalization: Towards a historicization of their inter-relation. Cultural Studies, 14(3-4), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380050130392
Fandiño-Parra, Y. J. (2021). Decolonizing English language teaching in Colombia: Epistemological perspectives and discursive alternatives. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 23(2), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.17087
Fashina, N. O. (2008). Post-colonial reading strategies and the problem of cultural meaning in African/Black literary discourse. Journal of Pan African Studies, 2(5), 60–77. https://www.jpanafrican.org/docs/vol2no5/2.5_Post_Colonial.pdf
Gibson, N. C. (2021). Decolonizing madness: The psychiatric writings of Frantz Fanon 1. In Fanon, phenomenology, and psychology (pp. 23–47). Routledge.
Goozee, H. (2021). Decolonizing trauma with Frantz Fanon. International Political Sociology, 15(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olaa014
Guillemette, L., & Cossette, J. (2006). Déconstruction et différance. Signo.
Ho, T. L. M. (2019). Contesting (post-)colonialism: Jane Eyre, Wide Sargasso Sea and three neo-Victorian rejoinders. In Neo-Victorian cannibalism: A theory of contemporary adaptations (pp. 7–54). Springer Nature.
Kehinde, A. (2002). Post-colonial literatures as counter discourse: JM Coetzee’s Foe and the reworking of the canon. Opuliche: A Story of Courage and Triumph, 33–57. https://doi.org/10.5070/F7323016508
Krieg, A. (2023). Subversion: The strategic weaponization of narratives. Georgetown University Press.
Lionnet, F. (2018). Postcolonial representations: Women, literature, identity. Cornell University Press.
Löfgren, I. (2022). Nineteen Eighty-Four, totalitarian lived skepticism, and unlearning how to love. Policy Futures in Education, 20(3), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103211031424
Lueg, K., & Lundholt, M. W. (Eds.). (2020). Routledge handbook of counter-narratives. Routledge.
Matthews, A. (2018). Gender, ontology, and the power of the patriarchy: A postmodern feminist analysis of Octavia Butler’s Wild Seed and Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. Women’s Studies, 47(6), 637–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2018.1492403
Mechkarini, S., Rutherford, D. S., & Sèbe, B. (2023). Unmasking the colonial past: Memory, narrative, and legacy. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 51(5), 825–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/03086534.2023.2262873
Munslow, A. (2016). The new history. Routledge.
Navabi, M. (2006). The power of oral tradition: Critically resisting the colonial footprint. In Anti-colonialism and education (pp. 175–192). Brill.
Parry, B. (2004). The institutionalization of postcolonial studies. In N. Lazarus, The Cambridge companion to postcolonial literary studies (pp. 66–80). Cambridge University Press.
Parry, B. (2023). Problems in current theories of colonial discourse. In Postcolonialism (pp. 714–747). Routledge.
Petrovi?, A. (2022). Preserving one’s humanity in challenging times: The various forms of resistance in George Orwell’s 1984. PHILOLOGIA MEDIANA, 14(14). https://doi.org/10.46630/phm.14.2022.10
Rahman, F. (2023). What we talk about when we talk about language and philosophy. Deepublish.
Rose, D. (2022). George Orwell, objectivity, and the reality behind illusions. Perception, 51(7), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066221094756
Schor, P. (2015). Postcolonial exceptionality and the Portuguese language: José Eduardo Agualusa’s The Book of Chameleons. Frame: Tijdschrift voor Literatuurwetenschap, 28(2), 51–69.
Shah, T. (2010). Securitized identities and less secure western multi-ethnic states: A critical geopolitics of the East–West discourse–Turkey and beyond. Nationalities Papers, 38(3), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905991003646797
Shurgot, M. W. (2016). Shakespeare’s sense of character: On the page and from the stage. Routledge.
Silverman, H. J. (Ed.). (2004). Derrida and deconstruction. Routledge.
Simkin, S. (Ed.). (2011). Revenge tragedy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Stoddart, M. C. (2007). Ideology, hegemony, discourse: A critical review of theories of knowledge and power. Social Thought & Research, 191–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.5226
Sultana, S. (2023). From post-structuralism and Marxism to postcolonial cultural subversion and political resistance against the once-colonized. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 5(4), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i4.1471
Urbán, B. (2013). Wounds and history: Post-colonial trauma in José Eduardo Agualusa’s The Book of Chameleons. In Is this a culture of trauma? An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 119–128). Brill.
Vogler, G. (2020). The ambiguity of subversion: Resistance through radio broadcasting. Theoria, 67(165), 65–91. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48745815
Wang, F. (2018). Subversive leadership and power tactics. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(4), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2017-0081
Wang, J. (2024). Beyond Ophelia: A deep dive into the agency and constraints of female characters in Hamlet. Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 3(1), 80–88. https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/jrssh/article/view/627
Wieszczek, K. (2025). George Orwell and Communist Poland: Émigré, official and clandestine receptions. Taylor & Francis.
Yegen, C., & Abukan, M. (2014). Derrida and language: Deconstruction. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(2), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v6i2.5210